The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Community Sample of Young Children in Flanders

By K. Van Leeuwen, T. Meerschaert, G. Bosmans, Leen De Medts, C. Braet. 2006

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7be28a4525e4dc78d372d1736a9b768bb5a5564

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Rutger C. M. E. Engels
2. Ad A. Vermulst
3. R. Otten
4. J. Janssens
5. Lisanne L. Stone

In Education

1. Rutger C. M. E. Engels
2. Ad A. Vermulst
3. R. Otten
4. J. Janssens
5. Lisanne L. Stone

Citations in the corpus

• Psychometric Properties of the Parent and Teacher Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-Olds: A Review (2010, methodology): “…retrieved from the following studies: Du et al. (2008), Goodman (1997, 2001), Koskelainen et al. (2001), Mathai et al. (2002), Mellor (2004), Van Leeuwen et al. (2006), and Widenfelt et al. (2003). k = 8 between HoNOSCA and the hyperactivity-inattention scales of r = 0.33 for parent and r =…”
• Teachers’ self-efficacy in relation to individual students with a variety of social–emotional behaviors: A multilevel investigation (2016, unknown): “These fit indices are consistent with previous research (Goodman et al., 2010; van Leeuwen et al., 2006), reporting acceptable RMSEA and SRMR values for the three-factor solution, but CFIs below the conventional threshold of .90 for satisfactory fit (e.g., Bentler, 1990, 1992; Little, 2013).”