How does Reynoutria invasion fit the various theories of invasibility?

By K. Bímová, B. Mandák, I. Kašparová. 2004

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Neophytes in Austria: Habitat preferences and ecological effects (2005, background): “…Helianthus tuberosus) in nutrient-rich, well-watered sites form dense stands, outcompete native taxa (Walser 1995; Kowarik 1999), change succession patterns, and form new vegetation types (Sukopp & Sukopp 1994; Hartmann & Konold 1995; Walser 1995, Wadsworth et al. 2000; Bimova et al. 2004).”
Impact of Parthenium hysterophorus L. invasion on plant species composition and soil properties of grassland communities in Nepal (2011, result): “These results contrast with the conclusions of many other studies, which suggest that invasive species have negative effects on species diversity (e.g., Bimova et al., 2004; Dunbar and Facelli, 1999; Kohli et al., 2004; Pysek and Pysek, 1995).”
Interactions between non‐native plant species and the floristic composition of common habitats (2006, background): “Many studies have focused upon the devastating local scale impacts; for example, Fallopia japonica forms dense stands that prevent other species from growing (Pysek et al. 1995; Bimova et al. 2004).”
The EPPO prioritization process for invasive alien plants (2010, background): “, 1989, 2000; Bı́mová et al., 2004), such impacts can be estimated by considering the species’ ability to build large, dense and persistent populations (cover of at least 80%), as proposed by Brunel & Tison (2005) and Branquart (2007). This is expected to be more often encountered with perennial pla”