Partnerships and public procurement: building social capital through supply relations

By A. Erridge, J. Greer. 2002

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contracts, relationships and integration: towards a model of the procurement of complex performance (2009, unknown): “…mechanisms in PCP, especially public-private, relationships: power imbalance (Grimshaw et al., 2002); divergent values and strategies9 in contractual negotiations/performance management (Teisman and Klijn, 2004); inappropriate risk and benefit sharing (Dixon et al., 2005; Erridge and Greer, 2002).”
The dynamics of contractual and relational governance: Evidence from long-term public–private procurement arrangements (2008, unknown): “, 2002), postcontractual supplier lock-in (Lonsdale, 2005), divergent values and strategies(4) in both contractual negotiations and subsequent performance management (Teisman and Klijn, 2004), and inappropriate risk and benefit sharing (Dixon et al., 2005; Erridge and Greer, 2002).”
Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective (2014, background): “However, in procurement, interaction and communication between public buyers and potential suppliers can be constrained by lack of skills, risk aversion or too rigid an application of procurement procedures and practices (Erridge and Greer, 2002).”
Promoting competitive markets: The role of public procurement (2005, unknown): “For a PPE an individual purchase can often be a one off, internal expertise cannot be built up (Erridge & Greer, 2002).”