Structure of Competitive Transit Networks

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

City logistics in Spain: Why it might never work (2012, background): “…with a general idea of sustainability in mind (Topp & Pharoah, 1994), including bike lanes, underground and tram systems, more efficient bus systems (Daganzo, 2010) and the enlargement of pedestrian areas, which has generally led to larger and stricter restrictions regarding freight deliveries.”
Advancements in continuous approximation models for logistics and transportation systems: 1996–2016 (2017, background): “ondemand vehicles at each zone and assuming the ride time on a ﬁxed route is a function of zone count. Quadrifoglio et al. (2006) Develops bounds on the maximum longitudinal velocity in MAST setting. Daganzo (2010) X X X X Discusses network shapes and operating characteristics to make transit system”
A review of public transport economics (2021, background): “Daganzo (2010) takes a different approach by considering a multimodal grid network in which he benchmarks optimally designed bus, BRT and metro technologies.”
Morning Commute with Competing Modes and Distributed Demand: User Equilibrium, System Optimum, and Pricing (2012, background): “If dedicated space for transit is deployed uniformly (5)Daganzo (2010) shows that the optimal spatial structure of transit service is insensitive to demand, whereas the optimal headway is not.”