Measuring Intelligence: Facts and Fallacies

By David J. Bartholomew. 2004

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b684efa7578b61a9815e162f58f4255cb8e91ad4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study. (2005, unknown): “For a sophisticated and statistically informed analysis of Howe’s 11 other points, readers are referred to Bartholomew’s (2004) excellent book, Measuring intelligence: Facts and fallacies. For a recent study on the appreciable overlap between the SAT and conventional IQ measures, see Frey and Detter”
A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. (2006, background): “Given most conceptualizations of intelligence (e.g., Bartholomew, 2004), and also most theories of psychometric g, a newborn cannot be viewed as intelligent.”
Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can't like Parties if you Don't like People (2012, background): “causal interpretation of the common factor model that the authors set up as their foil (Lord & Novick, 1968; Messick, 1989; McDonald, 2003; Bartholomew, 2004).”
The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, unknown): “…single functions (e.g., arithmetic skills), feelings (e.g., pride) or attitudes (e.g., religiosity); locationist perspectives on such functions, feelings, and attitudes and their hypothesized unique “signature” in the brain increasingly turn out to be wrong (e.g., Bartholomew 2004; Poldrack 2006).”
Raven’s test performance of sub-Saharan Africans: average performance, psychometric properties, and the Flynn Effect (2010, methodology): “In this section, we view g in terms of Jensen's (1998) factor analytic definition (cf. Bartholomew, 2004), which is closely related to other views on intelligence (Carroll, 1993; McGrew, 2005).”
Inequality with Ordinal Data (2017, unknown): “(23)Another example is the IQ score, which can be used for rank comparisons, but not as interval data for many authors: the di erence between an IQ of 130 and one of 100 is not equivalent to the di erence between an IQ of 100 and one of 70 (Mackintosh 1998, Bartholomew 2004). (24)See Knapp (1990), N”
Correlation and Causation in the Study of Personality (2012, background): “Mulaik (2005) reviewed certain aspects of the controversies; noteworthy recent contributions include Borsboom, Mellenbergh, and van Heerden (2003), Molenaar (2004), Bartholomew (2004), Ashton and Lee (2005), and Bartholomew, Deary, and Lawn (2009).”
A systematic literature review of the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans (2010, background): “It is important to note that an observed IQ score does not necessarily equal a particular level of general intelligence or g (Bartholomew, 2004), as it is necessary to consider the issue of validity in interpreting an observed score as an indication of the position on a latent variable such as g.”