Recent advances in conservation biological control of arthropods by arthropods
By M. Jonsson, S. Wratten, D. Landis, G. Gurr. 2008
301 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d74228d65da0eca9480f9356429329d3cd9e88d2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- REVIEW: Ants as tools in sustainable agriculture (2015, background): “control systems (Cullen et al. 2008; Griffiths et al. 2008; Jonsson et al. 2008).”
- Insect attraction to synthetic herbivore‐induced plant volatile‐treated field crops (2011, background): “Conservation biological control involves practices that increase the efficacy of natural enemies through modification of the biotic environment and/or pesticide usage (Eilenberg et al., 2001; Gurr et al., 2004; Jonsson et al., 2008).”
- Wildflower plantings enhance the abundance of natural enemies and their services in adjacent blueberry fields (2015, background): “To enhance these insects, a diverse assemblage of flowering, non-crop plants can provide the pollen and nectar necessary to support populations throughout the season (Landis et al., 2000; Wanner et al., 2006; Jonsson et al., 2008).”
- Habitat manipulation to mitigate the impacts of invasive arthropod pests (2010, background): “Habitat management can be used to provide natural enemies with resources that can be limiting in agroecosystems (Barbosa 1998; Pickett and Bugg 1998; Landis et al. 2000; Gurr et al. 2004; Jonsson et al. 2008).”
- Agronomic aspects of strip intercropping lettuce with alyssum for biological control of aphids (2013, background): “Habitat management with insectary plants is a form of conservation biological control that can make highly disturbed agroecosystem s for annual crops more favorable environments for natural enemies of agricultural pests (Jonsson et al., 2008; Landis et al., 2000 ).”
- Effect of ground-cover management on spider mites and their phytoseiid natural enemies in clementine mandarin orchards (II): Top-down regulation mechanisms (2011, background): “Several reviews emphasize the importance of understanding the often complex relationship between natural enemy diversity and biological control (Tscharntke et al., 2007; Griffiths et al., 2008; Jonsson et al., 2008; Straub et al., 2008; Moreno et al., 2010).”
- Field responses of predaceous arthropods to methyl salicylate: A meta-analysis and case study in cranberries (2011, background): “The use of agricultural practices to augment, conserve, and increase the efficacy of predatory arthropods is desirable in biological pest control programs (Barbosa, 1998; Jonsson et al., 2008).”
- Landscape-scale interactions of spatial and temporal cropland heterogeneity drive biological control of cereal aphids (2017, background): “Natural enemies are important for regulating pest populations and promoting them may be an effective alternative to reduce pesticide application (Pimentel 2005; Jonsson et al. 2008).”
- Companion Planting and Insect Pest Control (2013, background): “[137] Jonsson M, Wratten S D, Landis D A and Gurr G M.”
- Larger wildflower plantings increase natural enemy density, diversity, and biological control of sentinel prey, without increasing herbivore density (2012, background): “Many beneficial insects, including natural enemies, require access to alternate hosts, overwintering habitats, a constant food supply, and appropriate microclimates in order to survive (Johnson & Triplehorn, 2005; Jonsson et al., 2008).”