Habitat manipulation to mitigate the impacts of invasive arthropod pests
By M. Jonsson, S. Wratten, D. Landis, J. Tompkins, R. Cullen. Biological Invasions, 2010
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84919a9b8ec7cb6a4f505ddfea68b4a3e8794eaf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review (2013, background): “Among hese, the manipulation of the landscape and habitat structures as been suggested as a means to influence the dynamics of both nsect pests and their natural enemies (Jonsson et al., 2010).”
- A ‘Goldilocks’ hypothesis for dispersal of biological control agents (2011, background): “…methyl salicylate and other host plant-induced volatiles (James 2003; James and Price 2004; Lee 2010), and the planting of flower strips to reduce nectar foraging distances by natural enemies (Corbett 1998; Gurr and Wratten 1999; Corbett and Plant 1993; Lee and Heimpel 2005; Jonsson et al. 2010).”
- Wildflower plantings enhance the abundance of natural enemies and their services in adjacent blueberry fields (2015, background): “Provision of habitat and resources to support beneficial insects can be used within conservation biological control programs to suppress pest populations (Pickett and Bugg, 1998; Landis et al., 2000; Jonsson et al., 2010).”
- Beyond nectar provision: the other resource requirements of parasitoid biological control agents (2016, background): “Of 11 studies included in their meta-analysis, Jonsson et al. (2010) found that seven showed evidence of increased parasitism rates or predation, but only one demonstrated a decrease in pests and crop damage, the ultimate measure of success.”