An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops

By Florence Jacquet, J. Butault, L. Guichard. 2011

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe (2019, background): “Surveys of the arable sector also show that low input arable systems generate better economic results than high input systems (Devienne et al., 2017; Lechenet et al. 2017; Jacquet et al., 2011).”
Quantifying pesticide overuse from farmer and societal points of view: An application to Thailand (2013, background): “Studies on the impact of pesticide policies, which rely on mathematical programming models, consider external costs as the basis for designing taxes to internalize these costs (Falconer, 2000; Jacquet et al., 2011; Koleva et al., 2011).”
Incentives and policies for integrated pest management in Europe: a review (2014, unknown): “Concerning the tax on pesticide use, we know that price elasticity of pesticide use is very low and therefore very high tax rates are needed to achieve reduction (Falconer and Hodge 2001; Jacquet et al. 2011; Skevasa et al. 2012).”