Differences in attachment security between African-American and white children: ethnicity or socio-economic status?

By M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, P. Kroonenberg. 2004

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d72c87ab0ba64f35a920ad42d399f9dd341c45c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
2. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
3. E. M. Euser
4. C. Cyr
5. J. Belsky
6. R. Fearon

In Social Psychology

1. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
2. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
3. E. M. Euser
4. C. Cyr
5. J. Belsky
6. R. Fearon

Citations in the corpus

• Precursors of attachment security (2018, unknown): “…the only genetic study of infant–father attachment, which relied on AQS security scores derived from mother sorts of infant behavior vis-à-vis the father (Bakermans-Kranenburg et al., 2004): Genetic modeling revealed that attachment was explained virtually exclusively by shared environmental (59”
• Attachment security and disorganization in maltreating and high-risk families: A series of meta-analyses (2010, background): “Bakermans-Kranen- burg et al. (2004) demonstrated that the link between low-income African American families and child attachment insecurity (as assessed with the AQS) was partially mediated by maternal insensitivity, and that low income appeared to be a more important factor than ethnicity.”