A scalar analysis of landscape connectivity

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? (2005, background): “…the scale of the best model (Pearman 2002), matching the scale at which the organism perceives its environment to the scale of the landscape (Brooks 2003) or conducting macro-ecological analyses that derive predictive relationships between traits like body size or home range size and…”
Graph models of habitat mosaics. (2009, background): “…exactly analogous to the percolation threshold in raster lattices (themselves a special form of graph; Stauffer 1985; Keitt et al. 1997), and provides a convenient index by which to assess the dispersal capacity of a target species relative to the landscape – termed scale-matching by Brooks (2003).”
The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff‐dominated geomorphic systems (2007, background): “Important landscape characteristics include shape, size and location of feature in the landscape, whilst key species qualities are behaviour and patterns of gene flow (Brooks, 2003).”
Aquatic insects in a sea of desert: population genetic structure is shaped by limited dispersal in a naturally fragmented landscape (2013, background): “Genetic data are summarized to obtain estimates of functional connectivity between populations – i.e. realized rates of gene flow (Brooks 2003).”