Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?
By C. Kremen. Ecology Letters, 2005
1,436 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fb0be288c9e03a8703e2f4341a48fe3edb91fa7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Wilfried Thuiller
- S. Lavorel
- J. Emmett Duffy
- Sven Wunder
- David A. Wardle
- Antoine Guisan
- E. Gómez‐Baggethun
- P. Balvanera
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Wilfried Thuiller
- T. Tscharntke
- C. Kremen
- S. Lavorel
- Carsten F. Dormann
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Antoine Guisan
- N. Williams
Citations in the corpus
- Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses (2012, background): “Current biodiversity experiments mostly start from random loss scenarios, whereas in reality, specific functional groups and traits often drop out first (Leps, 2004; Zavaleta & Hulvey, 2004; Kremen, 2005; Larsen et al., 2005).”
- Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities (2008, background): “Relatively speaking, mapping of the biophysical production (row 1) and flows of ecosystem services has perhaps seen the most progress, but, as we have indicated, much remains to be done (44, 45).”
- Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. (2011, background): “Context describes the environmental, socio-political, and economic processes and realities that define human and ecological community structure and hence their importance to quality of life (Kremen, 2005; Fisher et al., 2009).”
- Ecosystem engineering in space and time. (2007, background): “The engineering concept, however, has yet to be explicitly incorporated into consideration of ecosystem services (e.g. Kremen 2005).”
- The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach (2008, background): “This exercise was necessary because of the increasing importance of the economic value of ES in ‘engineered’ landscapes (Matson et al., 1997; Gurr et al., 2004; Kremen, 2005; Robertson and Swinton, 2005).”
- Biodiversity, functional roles and ecosystem services of groundwater invertebrates (2008, methodology): “1), a situation that might arise in even communities with little functional differentiation (Kremen 2005).”
- The adoption of silvopastoral systems promotes the recovery of ecological processes regulated by dung beetles in the Colombian Andes (2011, background): “Quantifying and interpreting the relationships between biodiversity and functional integrity is of great value for evaluating and predicting the true environmental consequences of the management and use of ecosystems (Kremen, 2005).”
- Loss of habitat and connectivity erodes species diversity, ecosystem functioning, and stability in metacommunity networks (2017, background): “This has implications for a wide range of ecosystem services linked to productivity, such as carbon storage (Kremen 2005, Mitchell et al. 2013, Ziter et al. 2013).”
- The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review (2011, background): “Ecosystem services can be simply defined as a set of ecosystem functions that are useful to humans (Kremen, 2005).”
- Arthropods as bioindicators of sustainable forest management, with a focus on plantation forests (2009, background): “Among terrestrial ecosystems, forests support the greatest global biodiversity (Battles et al., 2001; Lindenmayer et al., 2006), and thus the conservation of forest biodiversity is an important goal for forest management (Lindenmayer et al., 2000; Kremen, 2005; Junninen et al., 2007).”
- Trends in Global Agricultural Land Use: Implications for Environmental Health and Food Security. (2018, background): “An alternative perspective is to develop diversified farming systems that rely on a diversity of ecosystem service providers for production and stability (85, 87).”