A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research

By Jonathan McGuire, Robyn Langdon, Max Coltheart, Catriona Mackenzie. 2009

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6e06614bf49e5655f978806ed179ef9a8ec9529

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. P. Mcgraw
2. Daniel M. Bartels
3. Christopher W Bauman

In Information Systems and Management

1. Christopher W Bauman
2. Geoffrey P. Goodwin

In Social Psychology

1. A. P. Mcgraw
2. Caleb Warren
3. Daniel M. Bartels
4. Christopher W Bauman

Citations in the corpus

• Revisiting External Validity: Concerns About Trolley Problems and Other Sacrificial Dilemmas in Moral Psychology (2014, background): “…Greene and colleagues’ dual-process theory andMikhail and colleagues’moral grammar theory, which have spurred evenmore experimentation and methodological and theoretical innovations (see Greene, 2007; Greene et al., 2001; Mikhail, 2007, 2009; and for a broader discussion, Bartels et al., in press).”