Competition, seed limitation, disturbance, and reestablishment of California native annual forbs

By Eric W. Seabloom, Elizabeth T. Borer, V. Boucher, Rebecca S. Burton, K. Cottingham, L. Goldwasser, W. Gram, B. Kendall, Fiorenza Micheli. 2003

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6c0034c3e90bf71ff1ec6ad22a9c94b03e132af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Mechanisms of Plant Invasions of North American and European Grasslands (2011, background): “These positive feedbacks can lead to increased growth or allocation to seed production by the invader (e.g., Mason et al. 2008), which in turn can affect invasion rates and dominance (Seabloom et al. 2003, Lockwood et al. 2005, Colautti et al. 2006).”
Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland (2006, background): “Because information on establishing native species on invasive-weed-dominated land is scarce (but see Seabloom et al. 2003), and failures are commonly reported by managers, our overall goal was to investigate the initial response of vegetation to various restoration strategies applied within the…”
Secondary invasion: The bane of weed management (2016, background): “Invaders may also generate legacy effects by simply reducing native propagule sources via suppression of native plants over long time periods and broad spatial scales, a condition that can be addressed by reseeding native plants (Seabloom et al., 2003).”
Forb Species Establishment Increases with Decreased Grass Seeding Density and with Increased Forb Seeding Density in a Northeast Kansas, U.S.A., Experimental Prairie Restoration (2009, background): “Comparatively low forb establishment in restorations may be due to low seeding richness and den- sity of forbs (Seabloom et al. 2003; Sheley & Half 2006) or to the inhibitory effects of seeding high densities of dominant grasses (Weber 1999; Kindscher & Fraser 2000).”
Field‐based competitive impacts between invaders and natives at varying resource supply (2008, background): “Experiments that have examined competition between invading annual exotic grasses and native perennials have suggested that exotics may be poorer competitors in relation to natives (Seabloom et al. 2003b; Corbin & D’Antonio 2004; and MacDougall & Turkington 2005).”
Exotic plants establish persistent communities (2006, background): “…where exotics facilitate their own growth (Bais et al. 2003; Vivanco et al. 2004), but native propagule addition may improve native growth in exotic communities where exotic success is reliant on disturbance (e.g., early successional communities) (Seabloom et al. 2003; Corbin and D’Antonio 2004).”
Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics (2005, background): “Finally, the common species studied do not appear to be dispersal limited and have the potential to colonize all open microsites (Seabloom et al. 2003; Yurkonis & Meiners 2004).”
Seasonal priority effects: implications for invasion and restoration in a semi-arid system. (2012, background): “…2011 British Ecological Society of early-arriving species on those arriving later in a system, can allow exotic species to colonize when they establish first and subsequently pre-empt resources on disturbed patches (Belyea & Lancaster 1999; Young, Chase & Huddleston 2001; Seabloom et al. 2003b).”
Demographic processes limiting seedling recruitment in arid grassland restoration (2011, background): “Seedling recruitment often is a central limitation to plant community restoration (Bakker et al. 1996; Seabloom et al. 2003).”
ARE INVASIVE SPECIES THE DRIVERS OR PASSENGERS OF CHANGE IN DEGRADED ECOSYSTEMS (2005, background): “These issues are especially relevant for understanding the causes and consequences of plant invasion (Mack et al. 2000, Seabloom et al. 2003a, b).”
Agglomerating seeds to enhance native seedling emergence and growth (2012, background): “Unfortunately, the success of these seeding efforts is typically less than desirable, especially in arid and semi-arid ecosystems (Seabloom et al. 2003; Lysne & Pellant 2004; James, Svejcar & Rinella 2011).”
Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “Many studies attest to invasion being facilitated by increasing water or nitrogen availability (eg, Seabloom et al., 2003).”
Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth (2011, background): “Much literature suggests that seeding at a very high rate shifts the competitive balance in favor of desired species and maximizes the chances of a seed reaching a safe site during restoration (Jacobs et al. 1996; Velagala et al. 1997; Seabloom et al. 2003).”