Resource Mobilization in International Social Entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a Mechanism of Institutional Transformation

By G. Desa. 2012

421 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6b777cc4c4d94b5ad5bc710da06846b45a1820b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, background): “Therefore, with the depletion of resources at their disposal, social entrepreneurs confronted with institutional constraints engage in “social bricolage” to reconfigure resources at hand (Desa, 2012).”
Turning Lead into Gold: How Do Entrepreneurs Mobilize Resources to Exploit Opportunities? (2018, positive): “Bricolage tends to be a response to resource scarcity (Baker & Nelson, 2005) and, as such, has been studied in contexts such as the family businesses of low-income households (Gras & Nason, 2015) and social venturing (Desa, 2012).”
What is challenging renewable energy entrepreneurs in developing countries (2016, background): “Normative challenges addressed in the literature include the extent to which general society has a positive view of entrepreneurship [27,42,52,56,57], and whether entrepreneurial activity matches both the formal [58] and informal [58,59] norms and rules of the society.”
Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship (2015, background): “Studies of social entrepreneurship have found institutions to be absent or weak, failing to deliver on their expectations and inhibiting social entrepreneurs (Desa, 2011; Urbano, Toledano, & Sorian, 2010). Research by Tracey, Phillips, and Jarvis (2011) has focused on the role that social entreprene”
Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China (2017, neutral): “So far, research on social entrepreneurship has mostly employed single case studies (Choi and Majumdar 2014; Dey and Steyaert 2010; Mair and Martı́ 2006; Short et al. 2009) with a few exceptions (see Desa 2012; Kistruck et al. 2013; Urbano et al. 2010).”
Scaling Social Impact: Building Sustainable Social Ventures at the Base-of-the-Pyramid (2014, background): “Yet little is known about the process by which ventures achieve scale when confronted by social or economic institutional voids that inhibit market creation or fail to accomplish the role expected of them (Khanna and Palepu 2000; Mair and Marti 2009; Desa 2012; Dacin, Dacin, and Tracey 2011).”
Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Review and Multilevel Causal Mechanism Framework (2019, background): “Supporting sustainabilityoriented enterprises on an institutional level is represented via governmental regulations, subsidiaries, and educational programs for sustainabilityoriented entrepreneurs (Desa, 2012; O'Neil & Ucbasaran, 2016).”
Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions (2020, background): “Owing to the limited financial profits that social enterprises create, they are often dependent on bricolage approaches, volunteers and social alliances for resource mobilization (Desa, 2012; Sahasranamam & Ball, 2016; Sakarya et al., 2012; Sharir & Lerner, 2006).”
Deconstructing the Way in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship (2018, positive): “A dominant social mission creates social value (Certo and Miller 2008; Desa 2012; Miller and Wesley 2010) and enables the social entrepreneurs to remain focused on the social value proposition (Austin et al.”
Social, Environmental and Sustainable Entrepreneurship Research (2015, background): “Scholars explore mechanisms that can address root causes by promoting institutional change (Desa, 2012; Parrish & Foxon, 2009; Zahra et al., 2009).”