The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Investigating the time-course of phonological prediction in native and non-native speakers of English: A visual world eye-tracking study (2018, background): “The difference in the time-course between phonological and shape predictions may be because shape relates to semantics, and semantic competitor effects are generally stronger and more sustained than phonological competitor effects (Hintz & Huettig, 2015; Huettig & McQueen, 2007).”
Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye- movements are modulated by reading ability - Evidence from Indian low and high literates (2012, methodology): “Participants were asked to perform a 'look and listen' task (Altmann & Kamide, 1999; see Huettig & McQueen, 2007, for discussion).”
Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world (2016, unknown): “Activation of these visual representations leads to cascaded activation at “higher” levels of representation (e.g. activation of semantic and phonological representations) within a few hundreds of milliseconds (see Huettig & McQueen, 2007; McQueen & Huettig, 2014 for experimental evidence).”
In the Infant’s Mind’s Ear (2010, background): “As other researchers have suggested before us (Huettig & McQueen, 2007), eye movements in a visual search task are driven by a wide range of factors participating in a tug-of-war, the resolution of which depends on the demands imposed by the specific task.”