Interviewing Cooperative Witnesses

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interviewing to detect deception (2014, methodology): “…as a lie detection tool, and since then more work has been carried out in this area (Leins, Fisher, & Vrij, 2012; Leins, Fisher, Vrij, Leal, & Mann, 2011; Roos af Hjelmsäter, Öhman, Granhag, & Vrij, in press; Vrij, Leal, Mann, Warmelink, Granhag, & Fisher, 2010; Vrij, Mann, Leal, & Fisher, 2012).”
Psychological vulnerabilities during police interviews. Why are they important (2010, background): “For example, in light of the high proportion of false confessions found among cases of DNA exonerations in the USA, recommendations for major reforms of police interview practices have recently been put forward (Kassin et al., 2010a, b).”
Building and maintaining rapport in investigative interviews (2014, methodology): “Showing empathy and personalizing the interview are recommended methods in the cognitive interview (Fisher & Geiselman, 1992), where rapport is seen as helpful in fostering accuracy in witness recall (Fisher, Milne, & Bull, 2011).”
Eliciting Reliable Information in Investigative Interviews (2014, background): “…tasks (e.g., recalling crimes, accidents, health-related experiences, earlier decisions), interviewees (e.g., young children, young adults, older adults, cognitive challenged), and nationalities (e.g., the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany; for a review, see Fisher, 2010).”