Surplus Distribution from the Introduction of a Biotechnology Innovation

By J. Falck-Zepeda, G. Traxler, R. Nelson. 2000

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d637689203030d1829aec0fa96a1bbbf97610e23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Qaim
2. Philip G. Pardey
3. M. Marra
4. Laura Riesgo
5. Jenifer Piesse
6. J. Alston
7. Y. Ismael
8. F. Areal

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. M. Marra
2. Philip G. Pardey
3. Jenifer Piesse
4. J. Alston
5. M. Qaim

In Plant Science

1. M. Qaim
2. S. Kouser
3. Y. Ismael
4. E. Rodríguez-Cerezo
5. Laura Riesgo
6. F. Areal
7. Colin Thirtle
8. M. Marra

Citations in the corpus

• Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants. (2002, background): “(45) calculated that the introduction of Bt cotton created an additional wealth of $240.”
• The Payoffs to Transgenic Field Crops: An Assessment of the Evidence (2002, methodology): “Falck-Zepeda, Traxler, and Nelson (2000) modeled the change in welfare effects from adoption of Bt cotton and Roundup Ready soybeans using a basic two-region Marra, Pardey, & Alston The Payoffs to Transgenic Field Crops: An Assessment of the Evidence framework (US and rest of world [ROW]), based on…”
• Impact of Bt cotton on pesticide poisoning in smallholder agriculture: A panel data analysis (2011, background): “Empirical evidence from various countries confirms that Bt cotton has allowed remarkable pesticide savings (Ali and Abdulai, 2010; Bennett et al., 2005; Falck-Zepeda et al., 2000; Morse et al., 2004; Pray et al., 2002; Qaim and de Janvry, 2005; Qaim et al., 2006; Traxler and Godoy-Avila, 2004).”
• Economic and agronomic impact of commercialized GM crops: a meta-analysis (2012, background): “Despite the fact that adoption of GM crops may reduce the number of pesticide applications (Falck-Zepeda et al. 2000a), seed prices more than offset such benefits.”
• The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops (2009, background): “…Sadashivappa & Qaim 2009 Mexico 77 9 295 Traxler et al. 2003 South Africa 33 22 91 Thirtle et al. 2003, Gouse et al. 2004 United States 36 10 58 Falck-Zepeda et al. 2000b, Carpenter et al. 2002 Bt maize Argentina 0 9 20 Brookes & Barfoot 2005 Philippines 5 34 53 Brookes & Barfoot 2005, Yorobe…”
• Can GM-Technologies Help the Poor? The Impact of Bt Cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal (2003, methodology): “The more analytical studies, such as Falck-Zepeda, Traxler, and Nelson (2000) apply economic surplus measures to determine the beneficiaries of GM crops, but again most are for the United States.”
• Do Consumers Really Refuse to Buy Genetically Modified Food (2004, unknown): “See for example Anderson et al. (2000), Lin et al. (2001), Falk-Zepeda et al. (2000), Traxler et al. (2000), or Lence and Hayes (2001).”
• Productivity Growth In World Agriculture: Sources And Constraints (2002, background): “The effect has been to reduce the application of chemical control from 8 to 10 to 1 to 2 spray applications per season (Falck-Zepeda et al., 2000).”