Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative French micro-start-ups
By Tristan Boyer, Régis Blazy. 2014
176 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d63165dc45484693bd790c57b8ae948b1a88c986
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems (2020, methodology): “The number 200 is based on previous studies’ average empirical survival rates for startups, which commonly vary between 56% and 67% after three years (Boyer and Blazy, 2014; Eurostat, 2017; Hyytinen et al., 2015).”
- Personal Characteristics of Entrepreneurs in the Context of Perception and Management of Business Risk in the Sme Segment (2015, background): “Boyer and Blazy (2014) examined the determinants of survival of non-innovative and innovative enterprises; the survival of these companies is associated with personality characteristics, such as gender, age, association with a national minority, professional experience and fi nancial resources. The ”
- The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, unknown): “Multiple studies investigate the effect of innovation on firm survival (e.g. Boyer and Blazy 2014; Tsvetkova, Thill, and Strumsky 2014; Howell 2015; Hyytinen, Pajarinen, and Rouvinen 2015), which has also been briefly discussed in the subsection on innovation and firm exit.”