Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change

By K. Matthias Weber, Harald Rohracher. 2012

1,143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d6250f573a8dd3b7b9fd10269603cc9204c17721

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Markus Grillitsch
2. Bernhard Truffer
3. Teis Hansen
4. Michaela Trippl
5. Karoline S. Rogge
6. F. Kern
7. Marko P. Hekkert
8. Franz Tödtling

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. F. Kern
3. Jochen Markard
4. Marko P. Hekkert
5. Bernhard Truffer
6. Frank W. Geels
7. Rob P. J. M. Raven
8. Markus Grillitsch

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Markus Grillitsch
2. Michaela Trippl
3. Teis Hansen
4. Bernhard Truffer
5. Lars Coenen
6. Franz Tödtling
7. Marko P. Hekkert
8. Rob P. J. M. Raven

Citations in the corpus

• Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? (2016, background): “…countries that pursue innovation-driven growth policies, a broader innovation policy framework is developing or has been called for (Ramstad, 2009; Shapira et al., 2001; Weber and Rohracher, 2012), comprising a shift beyond the traditional, post-war R&Doriented support for technological innovation.”
• Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? (2017, background): “Various authors (Klein Woolthuis, Lankhuizen, and Gilsing 2005; Smith 1998; Weber and Rohracher 2012) have identified a number of structural system failures which inform and shape system-oriented public policy support for innovation: • Capabilities’ failure: The lack of appropriate competencies and…”
• The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms (2015, methodology): “…the approach is often used to assess the performance of a TIS, to identify shortcomings and to derive recommendations for the design of policies in support of a specific technology (Alkemade et al., 2011; Jacobsson and Karltorp, 2013; Weber and Rohracher, 2012; Wieczorek and Hekkert, 2012).”
• Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis (2016, background): “Policy (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 ARTICLE IN PRESS”
• Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany (2018, background): “…for policy mixes which address the various market, structural and transformational system failures that hinder the much-needed decarbonization of the economy (Jacobsson and Bergek, 2011; OECD, 2015; OECD/IEA/NEA/ITF, 2015; Rogge et al., 2017; Rogge and Reichardt, 2016; Weber and Rohracher, 2012).”