Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties.

By M. Heckenberger, M. Bohn, J. Ziegle, L. Joe, J. Hauser, M. Hutton, A. Melchinger. Molecular breeding, 2002

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Molecular marker-assisted breeding options for maize improvement in Asia (2010, background): “Research at the University of Hohenheim, Germany, clearly demonstrated the suitability of SSRs in differentiating EDVs from initial varieties in maize, and provided the technical and statistical framework for determining EDVs (Heckenberger et al. 2002, 2003, 2005).”
Genetic distance based on simple sequence Repeats and Heterosis in Tropical Maize Populations (2003, background): “Therefore, before embarking onability (Heckenberger et al., 2002). a hybrid breeding program, CIMMYT conducted sev-Most evidence in maize suggests that the genetic basis eral diallel studies for identifying populations showingof heterosis is partial to complete dominance (Hallauer not only good per…”
Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP): overview of the technology and its application in crop improvement (2013, background): “Small changes in allele frequencies may occur during seed regeneration, line maintenance in differing locations, bulking during maintenance and line multiplication, or from contamination with seeds or pollen of other samples (Heckenberger et al. 2002; Warburton et al. 2010).”