Econometric models and economic forecasts

By Robert S. Pindyck, D. Rubinfeld. 2002

5,177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality (2003, background): “See Pindyck and Rubenfeld (1991) for technical details. from World Development Indicators (1999).”
Factors affecting farm enterprise diversification (2004, methodology): “The t-test results presented in the final column of Table 2 were obtained using the multiplicative dummy variable approach (see Pindyck and Rubinfeld, 1991).”
Bootstrap financing and owners’ perceptions of their business constraints and opportunities (2005, methodology): “In general this technique employs a cumulative logistic probability function to transform the original model such that the fitted values of the dependent variable fall between 0 and 1 (Pindyck and Rubinfeld 1981).”
Habitat heterogeneity affects population growth in goshawk Accipiter gentilis (2001, methodology): “Only models with residuals which did not deviate significantly from the assumption of a white noise process (Box–Pierce P > 0·05) were considered valid (Pindyck & Rubinfeld 1991).”