Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality

By Rafael Reuveny, Quan Li. 2003

387 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af6708d152cf20b95868f82de18735960dd8a2ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Mexico, 1990–2000 (2007, neutral): “…if omitted variables are correlated with the error term+ We believe that this bias is especially problematic in countries that enact economic 18+ Reuveny and Li 2003+ 19+ Alderson and Nielsen 1999+ 20+ See Te Velde 2003, for a review of the literature on FDI and income inequality in Latin…”
The Economic Origins of Democracy Reconsidered (2012, background): “For example, Reuveny and Li (2003) used FDI inflows and portfolio inflows as indicators of financial globalization in their study.”
Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “Based on a large pool of independent estimations (e.g. Reuveny and Li 2003; Jaumotte et al. 2013; de Haan and Sturm 2017) and qualitative reviews (e.g. Anderson 2005; Goldberg and Pavcnik 2007; Harrison et al. 2011), previous literature has been unable to establish conclusively whether…”
The Global Impact of Quotas (2008, background): “Individual country studies have also shown party magnitude to be important in countries such as Costa Rica ( Matland & Taylor, 1997 ), Norway (Matland, 1993), Namibia (Bauer, 2004), and Argentina (Jones, 1996).”
FDI and income inequality in Africa (2018, background): “In line with Reuveny and Li (2003), Herzer and Nunnenkamp (2011), Herzer et al. (2014) and Mihaylova (2015), FDI may have resulted in skill-biased employment that further increases the gap between the rich and poor.”
Politics and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean (2006, background): “Reuveny and Li (2003) found that inflows of foreign direct investment have a positive effect on inequality in a worldwide sample of countries.”
The effect of trade openness on women's welfare and work life. (2009, result): “…studies on globalization’s effect on income distribution support this conclusion by showing that trade openness (and in some studies, foreign direct investment) does not necessarily increase income inequality within a state (Bhalla, 2002; Bussmann, de Soysa, & Oneal, 2005; Reuveny & Li, 2003).”
The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies (2007, background): “Reuveny & Li (2003) show FDI inflows increase inequality, whereas trade openness actually decreases it.”