Allowing the Market to Rule: The Case of the United States

By D. Dill. 2003

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Changing Facets of Korean Higher Education: Market Competition and the Role of the State (2006, background): “Finally, as Dill (2003) points out in the examination of the US higher education sector, market-based policies are not without perils.”
Mission Diversity and Reputation in Higher Education (2008, background): “I will interpret these organizations as ‘corporate actors’ (Coleman, 1990, 531), and will assume that the explanation of social phenomena like differentiation and diversity is possible by means of analysing the behaviour and/or opinions of these corporate actors who need not necessarily be natural p”
Neo-Liberalism and Marketisation: The Implications for Higher Education (2006, background): “There is an increasing attempt to privatise public services, including higher education, so that citizens will have to buy them at market value rather than have them provided by the state (Stevenson, 1999; Dill, 2003; Steier, 2003; Angus, 2004; Bullen et al, 2004).”