A Dynamic Model of State Budget Outcomes under Divided Partisan Government

By James E. Alt, R. Lowry. Journal of Politics, 2000

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effects of party competition on budget outcomes: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain (2006, methodology): “Full Information Maximum Likelihood (see Alt and Lowry, 2000; Borge and Rattso, 1993, for similar procedures)16.”
Government ideology and economic policy-making in the United States—a survey (2017, unknown): “Ideology-induced policies on spending, taxation and labor market regulation were somewhat mitigated under divided governments (Alt and Lowry 1994, 2000; Bjørnskov and Potrafke 2013).”
Partisans, Professionals, and Power: The Role of Political Factors in State Higher Education Funding (2009, background): “…by state government, including levels of taxation, overall spending, and spending on specific social services, such as welfare and education (Alt & Lowry, 2000; Barrilleaux & Bernick, 2003; Barrilleaux, Holbrook, & Langer, 2002; Berry & Berry, 1990; Holbrook & Percy, 1992; Stream, 1999;…”
Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Performance-Accountability Policies for Higher Education (2006, background): “At a very broad level, a substantial literature indicates that party control can influence state policy outcomes, at least in some areas (Alt & Lowry, 2000; Barrilleaux & Bernick, 2003; Barrilleaux et al., 2002; Berry & Berry, 1990; Holbrook & Percy, 1992; Stream, 1999).”