Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.
By B. Leibovich, M. Blute, John C. Cheville, Christine M. Lohse, A. Weaver, H. Zincke. Journal of Urology, 2004
597 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5be009f8c0ee9380e081e873f8f159f1caca870
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. (2009, unknown): “1– 7 cm [3–5].”
- A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. (2007, background): “This explanation lacks merit because several recent reports have demonstrated a negligible risk of local recurrence as well as equivalent cancer-specific survival among patients treated with NSS versus RN for tumours up to 4 cm in size [11,25,26].”