Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery.
By V. Ficarra, G. Novara, Silvia Secco, V. Macchi, A. Porzionato, R. De Caro, W. Artibani. European Urology, 2009
1,009 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94e8346416eeea476f9b11f1228e53fb4ae11ba5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Fabian Isensee
- Jun Ma
- Klaus Hermann Maier-Hein
- B. Leibovich
- N. Heller
- M. Blute
- I. Frank
- Christine M. Lohse
Citations in the corpus
- Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. (2010, methodology): “In our multivariable analyses, we adjusted for tumor size, preoperative GFR, and surgical approach; however, we were unable to factor in recently reported scores that predict for surgical complexity [15,16].”
- EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. (2010, unknown): “…systems such as the Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) classification system, the RENAL nephrometry score, and the C-index have been proposed to standardise the description of renal tumours and aid in comparing nephron-sparing treatment strategies [39] [40] [41].”
- The KiTS19 Challenge Data: 300 Kidney Tumor Cases with Clinical Context, CT Semantic Segmentations, and Surgical Outcomes (2019, unknown): “[6], and the Centrality Index [20].”
- The state of the art in kidney and kidney tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced CT imaging: Results of the KiTS19 challenge (2019, background): “A number of manual scoring systems, termed nephrometry scores, have been proposed for this purpose (Ku-tikov and Uzzo, 2009; Ficarra et al., 2009; Simmons et al., 2010), but they have seen limited adoption due to the significant manual e ff ort they require (Simmons et al., 2012), the interobserver…”