Identity and the natural environment : the psychological significance of nature

By S. Clayton, Susan V. Opotow. 2003

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5a91f47053cb69d07899414611d2656c8d95ad5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour (2013, methodology): “Please note that our conceptualisation of environmental self-identity differs from the concept environmental identity (e.g., Clayton & Opotow, 2003; Schultz & Tabanico, 2007) which has been conceptualised as a sense of connection to some part of the nonhuman natural environment that affects the way…”
The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature ☆ (2004, background): “…localized approaches to broader reconceptualizations of our relationship to nature: cultural values (Stern & Dietz, 1994; Stern, 2000), how concern for nature can be increased through empathy (Schultz, 2000), and how our identity is shaped by the natural environment (Clayton & Opotow, 2003).”
Experiencing nature in children's summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences (2013, background): “Several concepts have been used such as affective connection to nature (Hinds & Sparks, 2008), Nature Relatedness (Nisbet, Zelenski, & Murphy, 2009), Environmental Identity (Clayton & Opotow, 2003), Inclusion of Nature in the self (Schultz, 2002), Connectedness to nature (Mayer & Frantz, 2004), and ”
A Look at the Ecotherapy Research Evidence (2009, unknown): “Public support of policies that protect the environment tends to be very high (Clayton & Opotow, 2003; Saad, 2001; Winter & Koger, 2004) whether or not it fi nds its way into the mainstream news.”
Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours (2020, methodology): “These include the Inclusion of Nature in Self Scale (Schultz, 2001), the Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS, Mayer & Frantz, 2004) and the Nature Relatedness Scale (Nisbett, Zelensky & Murphy, 2009) and it is recognised as having strong links to related concepts such as Environmental Identity (Clayt”
Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective (2008, background): “Recent research findings have added to the issue of valuation of ecosystem services an increasing recognition that environmental degradation and the issue of ecosystem management is not purely a technological question, but is partly behavioral and attitudinal as well (Clayton and Opotow, 2003, p.3).”