Toil enables reproducible, open source, big biomedical data analyses

By John Vivian, A. Rao, Frank A. Nothaft, Christopher Ketchum, J. Armstrong, Adam M. Novak, Jacob Pfeil, Jake Narkizian, A. Deran, Audrey Musselman-Brown and 17 more. Nature Biotechnology, 2017

1,154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

1. Baker, M. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016). 2. Yachie, N. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 310–312 (2017). 3. Hadimioglu, B., Stearns, R. & Ellson, R. J. Lab. Autom. 21, 4–18 (2016). 4. ANSI SLAS 1–2004: Footprint dimensions; ANSI SLAS 2–2004: Height dimensions; ANSI SLAS 3–2004: Bottom outside flange dimensions; ANSI SLAS 4–2004: Well positions; (ANSI SLAS, 2004). 5. Mckernan, K. & Gustafson, E. in DNA Sequencing II: Optimizing Preparation and Cleanup (ed. Kieleczawa, J.) 9.128 (Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2006). 6. Storch, M. et al. BASIC: a new biopart assembly standard for idempotent cloning provides accurate, singletier DNA assembly for synthetic biology. ACS Synth. Biol. 4, 781–787 (2015). open sharing of protocols. With a precise ontology to describe standardized protocols, it may be possible to share methods widely and create community standards. We envisage that in future individual research laboratories, or clusters of colocated laboratories, will have in-house, low-cost automation work cells but will access DNA foundries via the cloud to carry out complex experimental workflows. Technologies enabling this from companies such as Emerald Cloud Lab (S. San Francisco, CA, USA), Synthace (London) and Transcriptic (Menlo Park, CA, USA) could, for example, send experimental designs to foundries and return output data to a researcher. This ‘mixed economy’ should accelerate the development and sharing of standardized protocols and metrology standards and shift a growing proportion of molecular, cellular and synthetic biology into a fully quantitative and reproducible era.

Subfields: Biophysics, Information Systems and Management, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d58eed018f81eeb023bad9d08680a4251fa50618

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biophysics

  1. J. Joyce

In Information Systems and Management

  1. Atul J. Butte

In Molecular Biology

  1. David Haussler
  2. Robert M. Kuhn
  3. W. James Kent
  4. Mark Diekhans
  5. Kate R. Rosenbloom
  6. A. Hinrichs
  7. Brian J. Raney
  8. Hiram Clawson

Citations in the corpus