Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility
By John A. Palen, J. Gregory, Stephen W. Miller. 2000
608 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d574d08508e86e3fc5f4187e9dfa1c5e270878bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Robert J. Griffin
- Michael Siegrist
- Jan M. Gutteling
- G. Cvetkovich
- Ellen F. J. ter Huurne
- Claudia Roth
- G. Walker
- R. Wilson
Citations in the corpus
- Risk Information Seeking Among U.S. and Dutch Residents (2009, background): “Most people do not have enough knowledge of science and technology to be truly able to judge risks and benefits (Gregory & Miller, 1998).”
- Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries (2011, background): “First, some countries more than others have long traditions of dissemination of scientific knowledge to the lay public; in Europe dating back to the age of the Enlightenment, and in the USA to the early nineteenth century (Gregory and Miller, 1998).”
- eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World (2006, background): “The latter-mentioned political and sociological aspects of science are in response to earlier conceptions of science as a value-free enterprise, a position that has been vigorously challenged [28-30].”
- A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms (2005, background): “This is not to deny that the rationale for communication between sponsor and public is a complex, multifaceted issue; for a good discussion on the wider context, see, for example, Gregory and Miller (1998). 2.”
- Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception (2000, background): “People do not possess an elaborate knowledge about science and technology (Gregory & Miller, 1998).”
- Understanding and (dis)trusting food assurance schemes: Consumer confidence and the ‘knowledge fix’ (2008, background): “…the public understanding of science literature, which has also criticised how scientific communication uses simplistic models of ‘the public’ (Gregory and Miller, 1998), imagining them to be either helplessly ignorant (Maranta et al., 2003) or excessively knowledgeable (Jasanoff, 2005, p.…”