An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico
By B. H. J. Jong, R. Tipper, G. Montoya-Gómez. 2000
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d54729f1263fec6ed826a5143f29c6027d0f5246
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- E. Corbera
- K. Brown
- E. Mejía
- Luis Rico García-Amado
- Sara Barrasa García
- Felipe Reyes Escutia
- M. Pérez
- M. Hulme
In Global and Planetary Change
- E. Corbera
- K. Brown
- W. Adger
- E. Mejía
- Luis Rico García-Amado
- Sara Barrasa García
- Felipe Reyes Escutia
- M. Pérez
Citations in the corpus
- Adaptation to climate change in the developing world (2003, background): “At present there are serious risks to developing countries engaging in CDM activities, not least of which is that it may distort development priorities, and may also lead to the situation where the only domestic mitigation measures remaining are higher cost activities (Parson and Fisher-Vanden, 1999”
- The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services (2007, background): “On the other hand, carbon sequestration by forests is considered more economically efficient than other technological options for climate change mitigation in both developed and developing countries (de Jong et al., 2000; Richards and Stokes, 2004; Sedjo, 1989).”
- A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies: A Dozen Years of Research (2004, unknown): “De Jong et al. (2000) Chiapas, Mexico – 0–358 U.”
- Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico (2011, background): “, 2009) or the Scolel Té Project in Chiapas, one of the earliest carbon sequestration international programmes in the world (Jong et al., 2000).”
- Offsetting Benefits? Analyzing Access to Forest Carbon (2010, background): “commodification(1) has many methodological and moral pitfalls (Harvey, 1996; O'Neill, 2001; 2007; Vatn, 2000). McCarthy and Prudham (2004), for example, criticize the way in which a market approach is used to imagine and legitimate particular social orders which involve increasing privatization and ”