Cost-effective environmental policy: Implications of induced technological change
By K. E. Rosendahl. 2004
179 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5199513da8f3e56bbc3faf6c92d589be342029a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Patrik Söderholm
- Stéphane Hallegatte
- Grischa Perino
- Rolf Aaberge
- T. Sundqvist
- A. Vogt-Schilb
- Erin Baker
- Erling Røed Larsen
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Rolf Aaberge
- Grischa Perino
- Erling Røed Larsen
- A. Vogt-Schilb
- Erin Baker
- Patrik Söderholm
- Stéphane Hallegatte
- Ekundayo Shittu
Citations in the corpus
- Asymptotic Distribution Theory of Empirical Rank-dependent Measures of Inequality (2005, methodology): “A discrete choice analysis of panel data 313 G.H. Bjertnær (2001): Optimal Combinations of Income Tax and Subsidies for Education 314 K. E. Rosendahl (2002): Cost-effective environmental policy: Implications of induced technological change 315 T. Kornstad and T.O. Thoresen (2002): A Discrete Choice…”
- Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies (2007, background): “Rosendahl [10] even suggests that if learning rates differ across carbon dioxide reduction measures, carbon taxes should be differentiated according to these rates (at least as long as the learning effects possess public good features).”
- Does more stringent environmental regulation induce or reduce technology adoption? When the rate of technology adoption is inverted u-shaped (2012, background): “We ask how much technology adoption is optimal, given a particular marginal damage (MD) 2 Jaffe et al. (2002) state that “technology diffusion presumably lowers the aggregate marginal abatement cost function” (p. 54), and this assumption i”
- COMBINING MULTIPLE CLIMATE POLICY INSTRUMENTS: HOW NOT TO DO IT (2010, unknown): “Management of forests and ecosystems More information about the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment can be found at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham.”
- Optimal Timing of Climate Change Policy: Interaction Between Carbon Taxes and Innovation Externalities (2009, unknown): “Rosendahl (2004) shows that in an LbD model, the carbon tax should be higher than a Pigouvian tax, with the largest gap for those countries and sectors that generate most of the learning.”
- When starting with the most expensive option makes sense: Optimal timing, cost and sectoral allocation of abatement investment (2018, background): “…on pinning down sector-specific market or government failures that would justify different carbon prices in different sectors (e.g., Hoel, 1996; Rosendahl, 2004). nefits, such as driving fewer miles per year, using existing gas power plants more hours per year and existing coal power plants…”
- Escaping the Resource Curse and the Dutch Disease? When and Why Norway Caught up with and Forged ahead of Its Neighbors (2006, methodology): “A discrete choice analysis of panel data 313 G.H. Bjertnær (2001): Optimal Combinations of Income Tax and Subsidies for Education 314 K. E. Rosendahl (2002): Cost-effective environmental policy: Implications of induced technological change 315 T. Kornstad and T.O. Thoresen (2002): A Discrete Choice…”
- Unilateral Emission Reductions and Cross-Country Technology Spillovers (2004, background): “…also used in most of the literature on climate policy in the context of interactions between countries and endogenous technology development, see e.g. van der Ploeg and de Zeeuw (1994), Xepapadeas (1995), Ben Youssef (2003), Buonanno et al. (2003), Buchner and Carraro (2004) and Rosendahl (2004).”
- Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement (2008, background): “Rosendahl [ 41 ] assumes that technical change will reduce the MAC in the analytical”
- Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices (2017, background): “Supporting investments in low-carbon technologies and sectors (Acemoglu et al. 2012; Rosendahl 2004) can likewise encourage investments in innovation in solar panels, electric cars, and the like (Gerlagh, Kverndokk, and Rosendahl 2014; Smulders, Withagen, and Toman 2014).”