Discourse constraints on dative movement

By Nomi Erteschik-Shir. 2003

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4e79809db62b17bcaefbb33cef45546e4627b7e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' (2004, background): “First, a number of studies in the transformational-generative tradition have tried to determine which of the two constructions is basic and which is derived; in these studies, the two constructions are seen as purely syntactic alternatives that are semantically and pragmatically equivalent (see, for”
Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations (2002, background): “While it may be true that ditransitives that have paraphrases with to show a statistical tendency to passivize more easily than those that have paraphrases with for, the generalization is far from clear cut as many have observed (see Culicover and Wexler 1973; Erteschik-Shir 1979; Oehrle 1975).”
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives (2015, background): “On the other hand, each variant is associated with particular constraints that restricts its use (cf. Erteschik-Shir, 1979; Thompson, 1990; Bresnan, Cueni, Nikitina, & Baayen, 2007).”
Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation in spontaneous speech (2009, background): “…for speakers’ choice between the dative alternants have tended to invoke semantic di¤erences between the forms (Green 1974; Gropen et al. 1989), or constraints on the pronominality (Green 1971), information structure (Erteschik-Shir 1979) or length of the two arguments involved (Hawkins 1994).”
The nature of generalization in language (2009, background): “…between information structure and syntax allows us to begin to unravel some long-standing puzzles often assumed to only be amenable to formal treatments (cf. also Deane 1991; Erteschik-Shir 1979; Erteschik-Shir 1998; Ioup 1975; Kluender 1998; Kluender and Kutas 1993; Van Valin and LaPolla 1997).”
Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption (2011, background): “The differences have been documented time and again by many researchers (Arnold et al. 2000; Bresnan et al. 2005; Collins 1995; Erteschik-Shir 1979; Goldberg 1995; Goldberg 2006; Green 1974; Hovav & Levin 2005; Oehrle 1975; Thompson 1995; Wasow 2002).”