Effect of body weight, antler length, resource value and experience on fight duration and intensity in fallow deer

By D. Jennings, M. Gammell, Caitríona Carlin, T. Hayden. 2004

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4a4dec049fa17f742afcb01828f1b16af2a3843

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Fighting behavior in hermit crabs: the combined effect of resource-holding potential and resource value in Pagurus longicarpus (2006, unknown): “…when a resource yields a high fitness advantage, contest intensity may be relatively high—e.g. in hummingbirds (Dearborn 1998) and honey bees (Gilley 2001), but not in the fallow deer (Jennings et al. 2004)—compared with lowquality resources (e.g. in the speckled wood butterfly; Davies 1978).”
Fighting in fiddler crabs Uca mjoebergi: what determines duration? (2005, methodology): “We used the framework for contest analysis suggested by Taylor & Elwood (2003), one of the first studies to do so (but see Jennings et al. 2004).”
Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests (2009, methodology): “They used body mass and antler size as indicators of RHP, but, somewhat surprisingly, neither predicted victory (Jennings et al. 2004).”
Fighting for harems: assessment strategies during male–male contests in the sexually dimorphic Wellington tree weta (2006, unknown): “That contests are often settled based on RHP is well documented (for examples see Andersson 1994; Bradbury & Vehrencamp 1998; Riechert 1998) but there are often other factors (e.g. Neat et al. 1998a; Jennings et al. 2004).”
Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus (2008, background): “…have shown that the primary relationship is between the contest duration and the size of the smaller animal (e.g. Taylor et al. 2001b; Jennings et al. 2004; Prenter et al. 2006; but see Kemp et al. 2006): the inverse relationship with size disparity is merely a by-product of this…”
Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish (2011, background): “Contest behaviour that does not conform precisely to any of the existing models has been observed in a variety of taxa (e.g. Jennings et al. 2004; Briffa & Elwood 2002; Kelly 2006; Briffa 2008; Elias et al. 2008; Hsu et al. 2008).”