Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish

By A. Reddon, M. R. Voisin, Nandini Menon, S. Marsh-Rollo, M. Wong, S. Balshine. 2011

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9b2309ca337c63bc8b35674d096dbd8cbb06108

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. A. Reddon
2. S. Balshine
3. S. Marsh-Rollo
4. G. Arnott
5. R. W. Elwood
6. C. O’Connor
7. C. Dey
8. Mark Briffa

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Reddon
2. S. Balshine
3. S. Marsh-Rollo
4. C. O’Connor
5. G. Arnott
6. R. W. Elwood

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding how animals fight with Lloyd Morgan's canon (2012, background): “We go on to provide an explanation for recent studies that suggest an opponent-only assessment strategy (Rillich et al. 2007; Prenter et al. 2008; Reddon et al. 2011) and develop a simple two-dimensional state space model of motivation that accommodates different game theory models and their presume”
• Network structure is related to social conflict in a cooperatively breeding fish (2013, background): “In N. pulcher, as in most fishes, resource-holding potential is strongly correlated with body size (Reddon et al. 2011b) and N. pulcher social groups are stratified according to body size (Taborsky 1984, 1985).”
• Effects of isotocin on social responses in a cooperatively breeding fish (2012, background): “Reddon et al. (2011b) found that opponent size was the strongest predictor of contest duration and intensity in unrestrained N. pulcher contests.”