Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity

By K. Schiegg. 2000

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d49cf4163947f687edb1c75a677fc6f485db98c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. L. Fahrig
2. F. Götmark
3. J. Buse
4. Martin K. Obrist
5. P. Duelli
6. B. Nordén
7. O. Alinvi
8. R. Pettersson

In Insect Science

1. L. Fahrig
2. F. Götmark
3. J. D. Holland
4. B. Nordén
5. P. Duelli
6. Heidi Paltto
7. J. Buse
8. R. Pettersson

In Plant Science

1. F. Götmark
2. B. Nordén
3. R. Pettersson
4. J. Buse
5. Martin K. Obrist
6. B. Wermelinger
7. P. Duelli
8. J. P. Ball

Citations in the corpus

• Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges (2007, background): “…et al. 2000; Similä et al. 2002; Wermelinger et al. 2002; Similä et al. 2003), disturbances (Wermelinger et al. 2002; Moretti and Barbalat 2004) and various levels, qualities and connectivity of dead wood (Martikainen et al. 2000; Schiegg 2000a,b; Similä et al. 2003; Kappes and Topp 2004).”
• Fire and fire surrogate treatment effects on leaf litter arthropods in a western Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest (2006, background): “Leaf litter arthropods depend heavily on many structural elements in forests that may be impacted by fire management, including the amount of dead woody debris (Okland et al., 1996; Schiegg, 2000 ), litter abundance and composition (Koivula et al., 1999), and soil moisture (Sanderson et al., 1995).”
• Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? (2003, unknown): “Schiegg 2000 saproxylic insects dead wood on forest floor distance, amount I S E Schippers et al. 1996 badger Meles meles central Netherlands fraction of dispersers arriving at a patch DF M”
• Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle - A case study for saproxylic insect conservation (2007, background): “According to Schiegg (2000) habitat fragmentation in saproxylic beetles occurs on a more local scale ( 150 m).”
• Factors and scales potentially important for saproxylic beetles in temperate mixed oak forest (2007, background): “…(Siitonen, 1994; Jonsell and Nordlander, 2002; Similä et al., 2003; Bouget and Duelli, 2004), quality/amounts of dead wood in local stands (Nilsson and Baranowski, 1997; Ranius and Jansson, 2000; Schiegg, 2000; Ranius, 2002), and composition of the surrounding landscape (Økland et al., 1996).”
• Sampling saproxylic beetle assemblages in dead wood logs: comparing window and eclector traps to traditional bark sieving and a refinement (2007, background): “…bark sampling In accordance with earlier studies we found that window trapping yielded more individuals and species, although many are not saproxylic and thus often not the focus of interest (Økland 1996; Bakke 1999; Schiegg et al. 1999; Schiegg 2000; Ranius and Jansson 2002; Wikars et al. 2005).”
• Dynamics of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in windthrow areas in alpine spruce forests (2002, background): “This substrate is a prerequisite for many species of beetles, bees, wasps, ants, flies, mosquitoes and other invertebrates (e.g. SPEIGHT 1989; ALBRECHT 1991; GLÜCK and SPELDA 1996; IRMLER et al. 1996; ØKLAND et al. 1996; KÖHLER 2000; SCHIEGG 2000).”
• Determining the Spatial Scale of Species' Response to Habitat (2004, background): “Schiegg (2000) found that saproxylic beetles (those that are dependent on deadwood) responded to the spatial connectedness of dead-wood pieces within 150 meters (m) in a study that considered spatial scales ranging from 50 to 200 m in 50-m increments.”