ZigBee and Bluetooth strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications

By Nick Baker. 2005

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d45a50758aea88e5e654d491b33a4cc361d52d29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Andreas Willig
2. Mo-Yuen Chow
3. Jin-Shyan Lee
4. Gerhard P. Hancke Jr.
5. Fahad Alismail
6. Brendan Galloway

Citations in the corpus

• A Survey on the Electrification of Transportation in a Smart Grid Environment (2012, background): “ZigBee devices can quickly attach, exchange information, detach, and then go to deep sleep [77].”
• Recent and Emerging Topics in Wireless Industrial Communications: A Selection (2008, background): “Some general considerations about ZigBee in industrial applications can be found for example in [97], [98], [99].”
• A Review of Wireless Sensor Technologies and Applications in Agriculture and Food Industry: State of the Art and Current Trends (2009, background): “Thus, the suitability of ZigBee for monitoring in agriculture and food industry has been proposed by various authors [14,28,34-36].”
• A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi (2007, background): “For ZigBee and Bluetooth, Baker [6] studied their strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications, and claimed that ZigBee over 802.15.4 protocol can meet a wider variety of real industrial needs than Bluetooth due to its long-term battery operation, greater useful range, flexibility in a numbe”