THE IMPACT OF HERBIVORY ON PLANTS IN DIFFERENT RESOURCE CONDITIONS: A META-ANALYSIS

By C. Hawkes, Jonathan J. Sullivan. 2001

482 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d40e80458b8170ad6469028d449f11e66fdf6373

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Savanna glade hotspots: Plant community development and synergy with large herbivores (2012, background): “First, plant species vary in their tolerances to herbivory (Hawkes and Sullivan, 2001), and my results suggest that grazing of less tolerant Pennisetum at least partially suppressed its ability to competitively displace more tolerant Cynodon.”
Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. (2008, methodology): “While significant gaps exist in multiple stressor research, our results suggest an immediate need to account for stressor interactions in ecological studies and conservation planning.”
Impacts of marine invaders on biodiversity depend on trophic position and functional similarity (2014, unknown): “…effects with different ‘independence’ criteria Our main analysis treated effect sizes from the same invasive species tested in multiple studies (e.g. Hawkes & Sullivan 2001, Parker et al. 2006, Morales & Traveset 2009) and from orthogonal and nested experiments (e.g. Gurevitch et al. 2000, Parker…”
Are endophytic fungi defensive plant mutualists (2002, background): “…there is still considerable debate about herbivory as a selective force on plants in general (Crawley 1983, Marquis 1992, Strauss and Agrawal 1999, Hawkes and Sullivan 2001), grasses have generally adapted to grazing, with positioning of basal meristems near or below ground (Stebbins 1981, Hawkes…”
Disentangling the drivers of context‐dependent plant–animal interactions (2014, background): “Although monocots generally are able to better compensate for herbivore damage in high- versus low-resource environments, the same has not been found for dicots (Hawkes & Sullivan 2001), which has led to modifications of the Compensatory Continuum model (Wise & Abrahamson 2005).”
Plant community development is affected by nutrients and soil biota (2004, background): “Regrowth depends on resource availability such that at high resource availability herbivory enhances regrowth of grasses while forbs are favoured at lower nutrient levels (Hawkes & Sullivan 2001).”
Urbanization Shapes the Ecology and Evolution of Plant-Arthropod Herbivore Interactions (2019, background): “Water stress also induces stomatal closure, which conserves water but decreases photosynthesis, potentially reducing herbivory from phloemsuckers (Schaffer and Mason, 1990; Hawkes and Sullivan, 2001).”
Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. (2007, background): “…studies aimed at unravelling why plasticity is not more universal should be tackled with a broad ecological perspective and the experimental design should take explicitly into account the otherwise obvious realizations that species are not alone and that many environmental factors act in concert.”
Resistance and tolerance in Populus tremuloides: genetic variation, costs, and environmental dependency (2007, unknown): “This prediction, however, has not been widely supported by data (Hawkes and Sullivan 2001; Wise and Abrahamson 2005).”
Invasive plants do not display greater phenotypic plasticity than their native or non-invasive counterparts: a meta-analysis (2011, background): “…treatments and traits described above, mean eff ect sizes were considered signifi cant, i.e. overall plasticity was verifi ed, when L was positive and bias-corrected bootstrap 95% confi dence intervals (Adams et al. 1997, Gurevitch and Hedges 2001) did not overlap zero (Hawkes and Sullivan 2001).”
Human Involvement in Food Webs (2010, background): “The lack of runaway consumption and instability in terrestrial food webs, such as in the grasslands of the Serengeti National Park, are part and parcel of trophic linkages between herbivores and their resources that are weakened by particular traits of species that make them more tolerant to grazing”
Importance of large and small mammalian herbivores for the plant community structure in the forest tundra ecotone (2004, background): “For example, basal meristem monocots regrow faster after herbivory at high resources levels, while dicots respond better at low resource levels (Hawkes and Sullivan 2001).”