Survival probability estimates for the endangered loggerhead sea turtle resident in southern Great Barrier Reef waters
By M. Chaloupka, C. Limpus. 2002
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4068ac30c6b143b29d82b6463406fa7f5c216fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- M. Chaloupka
- C. Limpus
- K. Bjorndal
- A. Bolten
- Jeffrey A. Seminoff
- W. J. Nichols
- Jeffrey S. Miller
- G. Schofield
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- M. Chaloupka
- C. Limpus
- Jeffrey A. Seminoff
- K. Bjorndal
- A. Bolten
- W. J. Nichols
- G. Schofield
- P. Casale
Citations in the corpus
- Diving behavior and delayed mortality of olive ridley sea turtles Lepidochelys olivacea after their release from longline fishing gear (2006, background): “The survivorship of olive ridleys in the ETP is unknown, but likely similar to estimated annual survivorship probabilities of green and loggerhead sea turtle populations, which range from 0.6 to 0.9 (Chaloupka & Limpus 2002, Bjorndal et al. 2003a,b, Seminoff et al. 2003).”
- Investigating the viability of photo-identification as an objective tool to study endangered sea turtle populations (2008, background): “Accurate information about the population structure and ecology is not only vital to address the conservation needs of the Zakynthos sea turtle rookery, but could serve as an indicator of adult survival after departure from the breeding area (Chaloupka and Limpus, 2002).”
- Estimates of sex- and age-class-specific survival probabilities for a southern Great Barrier Reef green sea turtle population (2005, methodology): “The mean annual recapture probability for adults was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04–0.12) and is considered low for a CMR study despite the large sample size (see Chaloupka and Limpus 2002 ).”
- Monitoring green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at a coastal foraging area in Baja California, Mexico: multiple indices to describe population status (2003, background): “Further explanation of analysis of sea turtle capture^ mark ^ recapture studies is found in Chaloupka & Limpus (2002) and Bjorndal et al. (2003).”
- Green turtle somatic growth dynamics in a spatially disjunct Great Barrier Reef metapopulation (2004, background): “However, there are no sex-specific differences in annual survival probabilities for sGBR sea turtles (Chaloupka and Limpus 2002), so the sex-specific growth behavior and sexual dimorphism in adult size for the sGBR green turtle stock cannot be attributed to differential survivorship.”
- Conservation status of the loggerhead sea turtle in Brazil: an encouraging outlook (2007, background): “…useful measure of stock status (Balazs & Chaloupka 2004, Troëng & Rankin 2005) it is preferable to use ageclass-specific survival probabilities and abundance estimates to help diagnose sea turtle population status and trends (Chaloupka & Limpus 2001, 2002, Bjorndal et al. 2005, Dutton et al. 2005).”
- Conservation implications of sea turtle nesting trends: elusive recovery of a globally important loggerhead population (2019, background): “%) of the total population (Crowder et al. 1994, Heppell et al. 1996, 2003a, Chaloupka and Limpus 2002, Casale and Heppell 2016).”
- Survival probability estimates for immature green turtles Chelonia mydas in the Bahamas (2003, methodology): “More details of the application of this test were provided in Pradel et al. (1997) and Chaloupka et al. (1999), with specific application to sea turtle survival probability estimation in Chaloupka & Limpus (2002).”