Conservation status of the loggerhead sea turtle in Brazil: an encouraging outlook

By M. Marcovaldi, M. Chaloupka. 2007

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/330709abe1da69a1a9eda297a6e60facf00708ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Hays
2. Bj Godley
3. M. Chaloupka
4. AC Broderick
5. P. Casale
6. G. Schofield
7. C. Limpus
8. M. Hamann

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Hays
2. M. Chaloupka
3. Bj Godley
4. C. Limpus
5. AC Broderick
6. P. Casale
7. K. Bjorndal
8. Sebastian Tröeng

Citations in the corpus

• Circle hook effectiveness for the mitigation of sea turtle bycatch and capture of target species in a Brazilian pelagic longline fishery (2010, background): “The increased replacement of J and tuna hooks in favour of circle hooks can contribute greatly towards recovering trends of loggerhead and leatherback populations inhabiting the south-west Atlantic Ocean and nesting on Brazilian beaches (Marcovaldi and Chaloupka, 2007; Thomé et al., 2007).”
• Satellite-tracking of female loggerhead turtles highlights fidelity behavior in northeastern Brazil (2010, background): “It seems that the neritic foraging strategy maintained over a long period of time by Brazilian loggerheads leads to the relatively large body size of the population (102.8 ± 0.04 cm CCL, Marcovaldi & Laurent 1996; 103 cm, Marcovaldi & Chaloupka 2007).”
• Is climate change affecting the population dynamics of the endangered Pacific loggerhead sea turtle (2008, background): “, 2003), Brazil (Marcovaldi and Chaloupka, 2007), east coast Australia (Limpus and Limpus, 2003), east coast Japan (Kamezaki et al.”
• Conservation implications of sea turtle nesting trends: elusive recovery of a globally important loggerhead population (2019, unknown): “This differs from the strong declining (e.g., Spotila et al. 2000, Tapilatu et al. 2013, Mazaris et al. 2017) or increasing trends observed elsewhere for loggerheads and other sea turtle species (Marcovaldi and Chaloupka 2007, Chaloupka et al. 2008, Mazaris et al. 2017).”
• Marine turtles and IUCN Red Listing: A review of the process, the pitfalls, and novel assessment approaches (2008, background): “…turtles (Shanker et al., 2004; Abreu-Grobois and Plotkin, 2007), green turtles (Seminoff, 2004a; Broderick et al., 2006; Chaloupka et al., 2007) and loggerheads (Caretta caretta; Chaloupka et al., 2007, Marcovaldi and Chaloupka 2007), all of which are currently listed as Vulnerable or Endangered.”
• Are we working towards global research priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles (2016, background): “…and locally en abling legislation have likely contributed to successful population recovery at nesting sites around the world (Dutton et al. 2005, Marcovaldi & Chaloupka 2007, AbreuGrobois & Plotkin 2008, Chaloupka et al. 2008, Allen et al. 2010, Mortimer et al. 2011, Ehrhart et al. 2014, Weber…”
• Encouraging outlook for recovery of a once severely exploited marine megaherbivore (2008, background): “…giant leatherback, Dermochelys coriacea (St Croix, US Virgin Islands; Dutton et al ., 2005), the Kemp’s ridley, Lepidochelys kempii (Rancho Nuevo, Atlantic Mexico, Márquez et al ., 1998; Padre Island, Texas; Shaver, 2005) and the loggerhead, Caretta caretta (Brazil; Marcovaldi & Chaloupka, 2007).”