The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses.

By M. Zanarini, A. Skodol, Donna S Bender, R. Dolan, C. Sanislow, E. Schaefer, L. Morey, C. Grilo, M. T. Shea, Thomas H Mcglashan and 1 more. Journal of Personality Disorders, 2000

811 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4060688225683ee6be1b1e3c98e4a34ca639049

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Matthew K. Nock
2. E. Klonsky
3. T. Joiner
4. Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson
5. Mitchell J. Prinstein
6. B. Olatunji
7. Kathryn H Gordon
8. Y. Young-Xu

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Matthew K. Nock
2. T. Joiner
3. Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson
4. Mitchell J. Prinstein
5. E. Klonsky
6. Pawel Skudlarski
7. John C. Gore
8. David F. Tolin

Citations in the corpus

• Amygdala hyperreactivity in borderline personality disorder: implications for emotional dysregulation. (2003, methodology): “The DIPD-IV has been demonstrated to be reliable (Zanarini et al 2000).”
• Non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts. (2006, methodology): “The DIPD-IV is a widely used measure with adequate test–retest and inter-rater reliability (Zanarini et al., 2000).”
• Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II). (2011, background): “For SCID I, values were mostly in the fair and excellent category, and a bit lower than those of Zanarini and Frankenburg (2001) and Zanarini et al. (2000).”
• Ten-Year Course of Borderline Personality Disorder (2011, neutral): “74 for OCPD.(13) A standardized regression analysis examining how these levels of reliability might affect subsequent criterion counts found that observed rates of remission over time were only minimally affected, ie, changes of 0.”
• Trait and Daily Emotion Regulation in Social Anxiety Disorder (2016, result): “The SCID has also demonstrated good interrater and test–retest agreement in other research (Zanarini et al. 2000).”
• A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female victims of interpersonal violence. (2008, methodology): “Median interrater and test–retest reliability for the diagnostic modules used in this study are described in Zanarini et al. (2000).”
• The Disgust Scale: item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. (2007, methodology): “The DS has been used in a variety of nonclinical (Olatunji et al., 2004), analogue (e.g., Sawchuk et al., 2002), clinical (e.g., Woody & Tolin, 2002 ), and cross-cultural research (e.g., Olatunji, Sawchuk, de Jong, & Lohr, 2006).”