Human Mate Selection
By David M. Buss. 2020
463 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3f9f924f19522bc3b075a828a275767ff512682
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Aurelio Jose Figueredo
- Patrick M. Markey
- J. Langlois
- Daniel N. Jones
- Jon A. Sefcek
- Charlotte Markey
- Michel Tuan Pham
- P. Jonason
In Marketing
In Sociology and Political Science
- Patrick M. Markey
- Aurelio Jose Figueredo
- Daniel N. Jones
- Jon A. Sefcek
- Charlotte Markey
- R. Rogoza
- Jan Cieciuch
Citations in the corpus
- Sexual Strategies: A Journey Into Controversy (2003, unknown): “came out in American Scientist in 1985 (Buss, 1985), it was not until thel989 publication of the 37-culture study in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS; Buss, 1989b) that reactions grew intense.”
- The Ideal Romantic Partner Personality (2006, background): “For example, in both national and international samples (Buss, 1985, 1989), found that the two most highly ranked characteristics in a romantic partner by both men and women were ‘‘kind and understanding’’ and ‘‘intelligent’’.”
- Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. (2000, background): “Rather, it predicts that initially unrelated traits coevolve because of assortative mating (Buss, 1985).”
- Romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship experiences (2007, background): “Applying complementarity to romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship quality Past research examining the topic of assortative mating suggests that people tend to be romantically attracted to others who are similar to themselves (e.g., Buss, 1985; Vandenberg, 1972).”