Simulations of the Atmospheric General Circulation Using a Cloud-Resolving Model as a Superparameterization of Physical Processes
By M. Khairoutdinov, David A. Randall, C. DeMott. 2005
419 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3ee9b00c7fa26b4cb8dc5fa0b6c5c3e437a9c74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Chidong Zhang
- David A. Randall
- Hugh Morrison
- E. Maloney
- Duane Waliser
- C. DeMott
- F. Vitart
- Daehyun Kim
In Global and Planetary Change
- Hugh Morrison
- Chidong Zhang
- David A. Randall
- E. Maloney
- Duane Waliser
- C. DeMott
- F. Vitart
- Daehyun Kim
Citations in the corpus
- Could Machine Learning Break the Convection Parameterization Deadlock? (2018, methodology): “…approach has been to use cloud “superparameterization (SP)”, which computes the subgrid vertical heating and moistening profiles within a GCM grid cell by sampling a curtain of an embedded 2D CRM that uses convective permitting resolution [ Grabowski et al. 1999; Khairoutdinov et al. , 2005].”
- Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time‐scales (2008, methodology): “Furthermore, the results suggest that it is possible to reasonably represent the atmospheric variability on a wide variety of time and space scales using a conventional set of physical parametrizations, without necessarily having to specifically use an explicit global representation of convection (e”
- Structure of the Madden-Julian Oscillation in the Superparameterized CAM (2009, methodology): “2c and with the finding by Khairoutdinov et al. 2005 that boreal winter rainfall over eastern Indonesia and northern Australia, a sizable portion of which is related to MJO activity, is substantially overestimated by the SP-CAM.”
- Earth System Modeling 2.0: A Blueprint for Models That Learn From Observations and Targeted High‐Resolution Simulations (2017, background): “been nested in small, usually two-dimensional subdomains of atmospheric grid columns, as a parameterization surrogate that explicitly resolves some aspects of cloud dynamics (e.g., Grabowski & Smolarkiewicz, 1999; Grabowski, 2001; Grabowski, 2016; Khairoutdinov & Randall, 2001; Khairoutdinov et al.,”
- Moisture modes and the Madden-Julian oscillation. (2009, methodology): “Such a ‘‘superparameterization’’ was also used by Khairoutdinov et al. (2005) in place of the standard Zhang and McFarlane (1995) parameterization in the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Community Atmosphere Model (CAM).”
- Tropical and Subtropical Cloud Transitions in Weather and Climate Prediction Models: The GCSS/WGNE Pacific Cross-Section Intercomparison (GPCI) (2011, neutral): “…GEM Regional 0.58 3 0.58 53 Côté et al. (1998) CSU (US) BUGS Global 2.58 3 2.58 29 Colorado State University (2010) CSU (US) MMF Global/MMF T42 30 Khairoutdinov et al. (2005) DWD (Ger) GME Global 59.9 km 31 Majewski et al. (2002) ECMWF (UK) ECMWF Global T399 62 ECMWF (2006) ETH–MPI (Ger)…”
- Revealing differences in GCM representations of low clouds (2011, background): “Khairoutdinov et al. 2005; Wyant et al. 2006b).”
- The Role of Convective Moistening in the Madden–Julian Oscillation (2009, methodology): “This is consistent with the low tropical rain rate variability discussed in other studies (Khairoutdinov et al. 2005; Hack et al. 2006; Lin et al. 2006; Sun et al. 2006; DeMott et al. 2007), which generally conclude that the CAM convective parameterizations are triggered too often, resulting in…”
- Cracking the MJO nut (2013, background): “, 2007] and superparameterization [Grabowski, 2001; Khairoutdinov et al., 2005].”
- Challenges in Climate Science and Contemporary Applied Mathematics (2012, background): “This approach has been shown to be ideal for parallel computations on supercomputers and has yielded promising new results regarding tropical intraseasonal behavior [39, 40, 41, 65].”
- Representation of microphysical processes in cloud‐resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization (2015, background): “…led to the idea of the “superparameterization” of small-scale and mesoscale processes in large-scale models and GCMs [Grabowski and Smolarkiewicz, 1999; Grabowski, 2001; Khairoutdinov and Randall, 2001; Khairoutdinov et al., 2005; Grabowski, 2003, 2006; Tao et al., 2009a; Tao and Moncrieff, 2009].”
- Enforcing Analytic Constraints in Neural Networks Emulating Physical Systems. (2019, background): “0 [22] to simulate the climate for two years in aquaplanet configuration [23], where the surface temperatures are fixed with a realistic equator-to-pole gradient [24].”
- Application of MJO Simulation Diagnostics to Climate Models (2009, methodology): “resolving models for these processes (Khairoutdinov et al. 2005).”
- Multiscale Convective Organization and the YOTC Virtual Global Field Campaign (2012, methodology): “In superparameterization, cloud-system-resolving models are used in place of conventional parameterizations of convection and the planetary boundary layer in each grid cell of the parent global model (e.g., Grabowski 2001; Khairoutdinov et al. 2005; Tao et al. 2009).”
- Moist Static Energy Budget of MJO-like Disturbances in the Atmosphere of a Zonally Symmetric Aquaplanet (2012, background): “SPCAM is a modified version of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) where a small domain two-dimensional Cloud System Resolving Model (CSRM) is embedded within each grid point of CAM (Khairoutdinov and Randall, 2001; Khairoutdinov et al., 2005).”