The build-up of the colour-magnitude relation in galaxy clusters since z ~ 0.8

By G. Lucia, B. Poggianti, A. Aragón-Salamanca, Simon D. M. White, Dennis Zaritsky, D. Clowe, C. Halliday, P. Jablonka, A. V. D. Linden, B. Milvang-Jensen and 4 more. 2006

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Using galaxy clusters from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey, we study how the distribution of galaxies along the colour-magnitude relation has evolved since z ~ 0.8. While red-sequence galaxies in all these clusters are well described by an old, passively evolving population, we confirm our previous finding of a significant evolution in their luminosity distribution as a function of redshift. When compared to galaxy clusters in the local Universe, the high-redshift EDisCS clusters exhibit a significant deficit of faint red galaxies. Combining clusters in three different redshift bins, and defining as `faint' all galaxies in the range 0.4 >~ L/L* >~ 0.1, we find a clear decrease in the luminous-to-faint ratio of red galaxies from z ~ 0.8 to ~0.4. The amount of such a decrease appears to be in qualitative agreement with predictions of a model where the blue bright galaxies that populate the colour-magnitude diagram of high-redshift clusters, have their star formation suppressed by the hostile cluster environment. Although model results need to be interpreted with caution, our findings clearly indicate that the red-sequence population of high-redshift clusters does not contain all progenitors of nearby red-sequence cluster galaxies. A significant fraction of these must have moved on to the red sequence below z ~ 0.8.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3d6ce0b2252825494937c3648aaa9e93833dae6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. C. Conroy
  2. Risa Wechsler
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Simon D. M. White
  6. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  7. R. Somerville
  8. M. Cappellari

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Leon V. E. Koopmans
  2. T. Treu
  3. R. Somerville
  4. P. Oesch
  5. Jean-Paul Kneib
  6. L. Widrow
  7. E. Ricciardelli
  8. Risa Wechsler

In Instrumentation

  1. C. Conroy
  2. Risa Wechsler
  3. M. Cappellari
  4. F. V. D. Bosch
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. R. Somerville
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. L. Hernquist

Citations in the corpus