The Origin of Dwarf Ellipticals in the Virgo Cluster

By A. Boselli, S. Boissier, L. Cortese, G. Gavazzi. 2008

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the evolution of dwarf (LH < 109.6 LH☉) star-forming and quiescent galaxies in the Virgo Cluster by comparing their UV to radio centimetric properties to the predictions of multizone chemospectrophotometric models of galaxy evolution especially tuned to take into account the perturbations induced by the interaction with the cluster intergalactic medium. Our models simulate one or multiple ram pressure stripping events and galaxy starvation. Models predict that all star-forming dwarf galaxies entering the cluster for the first time loose most, if not all, of their atomic gas content, quenching on short timescales (≤150 Myr) their activity of star formation. These dwarf galaxies soon become red and quiescent, gas metal-rich objects with spectrophotometric and structural properties similar to those of dwarf ellipticals. Young, low-luminosity, high surface brightness star-forming galaxies such as late-type spirals and BCDs are probably the progenitors of relatively massive dwarf ellipticals, while it is likely that low surface brightness Magellanic irregulars evolve into very low surface brightness quiescent objects hardly detectable in ground-based imaging surveys. The small number of dwarf galaxies with physical properties intermediate between those of star-forming and quiescent systems is consistent with a rapid (<1 Gyr) transitional phase between the two dwarf galaxy populations. These results, combined with statistical considerations, are consistent with the idea that most of the dwarf ellipticals dominating the faint end of the Virgo luminosity function were initially star-forming systems, accreted by the cluster and stripped of their gas by one or subsequent ram pressure stripping events.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e139715e3fe27573b49cb30564d89d7b75599f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. Cappellari
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. T. Naab
  5. R. Somerville
  6. Thomas J. Cox
  7. M. Sarzi
  8. C. Conroy

In Instrumentation

  1. M. Cappellari
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. T. Naab
  5. Thomas J. Cox
  6. R. Somerville
  7. M. Sarzi
  8. J. Kormendy

Citations in the corpus