National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union

By Volker Nitsch. 2000

485 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3b68afd7597c76a2d15c87d4cf9479fc170a83a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Is the International Border Effect Larger than the Domestic Border Effect? Evidence from U.S. Trade (2009, unknown): “However, in column 6 we can no longer reject the hypothesis that their absolute values are equal (p-value = 0.30).”
Market Access in Global and Regional Trade (2011, unknown): “Taking representative coefficients mostly based on EU12 or even EU9 countries, Nitsch (2000) finds a border effect around 10 in 1990, Head and Mayer (2000) find 13 for the 1993-1995 period and Chen (2004) finds a multiplicative factor of 6 for internal trade flows in 1996.”
Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs with Panel Data (2011, unknown): “Also see Nitsch (2000).”
Language and Foreign Trade (2008, unknown): “People who live in large countries will find foreigners to be further away than those who live in small countries (compare Nitsch (2000) ).”
The Gravity Model Specification for Modeling International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreement Effects: A 10-Year Review of Empirical Studies (2010, methodology): “Remoteness is another impedance measure included in gravity model specifications; it indicates the geographic position of countries along markets and has been used in some studies [65, 74, 87].”
Honey, I Shrunk the Currency Union Effect on Trade (2002, unknown): “Later studies for Canada (Helliwell, 1998) and Europe (Nitsch, 2000) suggest that the home bias is rather close to factor 10, but even these numbers are still far above expectations.”
Intra-national versus International Trade in the European Union: Why do National Borders Matter? (2004, unknown): “As in Evans (1999), Hillberry (1999) and Nitsch (2000a), Y i,k is the production of exporter i in industry k, while Y j is the importing country's GDP 2 .”
Human Capital, Geographical location and Policy Implications: The case of Romania (2010, background): “This expression gives the average distance between two points on a circular location (see Crozet 2004, Head and Mayer, 2000, and Nitsch 2000) for a discussion of this measure of internal distance).”
Do state borders matter for U.S. intranational tradeq The role of history and internal migration (2007, background): “31, as reported in Nitsch [39]; see footnote 27).”
Integration effects in border regions - a survey of economic theory and empirical studies (2002, unknown): “S. trade (e.g. McCallum 1995, Helliwell 1998), OECD countries (Wei 1996) and the EU (Bröcker 1998, Head and Mayer 2000, Nitsch 2000).”
Immigration and the Trade of Provinces (2002, unknown): “We follow Leamer (1997) and Nitsch (2000) and assume internal distance Dff ¼ (AREAf= ) 1=2.”