Immigration and the Trade of Provinces
By Don Wagner, Keith Head, John Ries. 2002
375 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e49c3f701b701d2f8ef7e31b15db2d6d8c9e591c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Thierry Mayer
- Keith Head
- Jacques Mélitz
- F. Toubal
- Giovanni Peri
- Anne‐Célia Disdier
- Lionel Fontagné
- F. Requena-Silvente
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jacques Mélitz
- F. Toubal
- Thierry Mayer
- Giovanni Peri
- F. Requena-Silvente
- Keith Head
- John Ries
- Anne‐Célia Disdier
Citations in the corpus
- Migration and Trade (2012, neutral): “…of the existence of trade and migration data collected at sub-national levels: Canadian provinces (Helliwell, 1997, Partridge and Furtan, 2008, Wagner et al., 2002); French départements (Briant et al., 2009, Combes et al., 2005); and US states (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2008, Bardhan and…”
- Skilled Migration and Business Networks (2010, neutral): “2See for example Gould (1994), Lopez and Schiff (1998), Rauch and Trindade (2002), Rauch and Casella (1998), Wagner et al. (2002) .”
- The pro-trade effect of the brain drain: Sorting out confounding factors (2009, neutral): “So far, empirical gravity studies have typically focused on a single anchor country, see the survey of Wagner et al. (2002).”
- Isolating the Network Effect of Immigrants on Trade (2014, neutral): “If immigrants suffer 1 A partial list includes Dunlevy and Hutchinson (1999), Girma and Yu (2002), Wagner et al. (2002), Rauch and Trindale (2002), Combes et al. (2005), Dunlevy (2006), Bandyopadhyay et al. (2008), Felbermayr and Toubal (2012).”
- Bilateral trade of cultural goods (2010, background): “Eichengreen and Irwin 1998) or the link between immigration and trade ( Wagner et al. 2002 ).”
- Revisiting the Trade-Migration Nexus: Evidence from New OECD Data (2012, neutral): “8The host countries included are (number of non-missing source countries in brackets): AUS(24), AUT(25), BEL(22), CAN(27), CHE(25), CZE(22), DNK(25), ESP(27), FIN(25), FRA(28), GBR (28), GER(18), GRC(25), HUN(25), IRL(24), ITA(27), JPN(9), KOR(5), LUX(20), MEX(20), NLD(10), NOR(24), NZL(24), POL(26)”
- Native language, spoken language, translation and trade (2014, positive): “…host and home country, this stock of emigrants proves extremely important (Gould (1994), Head and Ries (1998), Dunlevy and Hutchinson (1999), Wagner et al. (2002), and Rauch and Trindade (2002)).19 As we see from Table 8a, once we introduce Migration (log) in our aggregate trade equation…”
- Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences? (2010, background): “White (2007), Bandyopadhyay (2006) and Wagner et al. (2002) review the associated literature.”
- Je t'aime, moi non plus : Bilateral opinions and international trade (2007, background): “This body of work recently surveyed in Rauch (2001) and Wagner et al. (2002), has repeatedly found that bilateral migration is a robust trade-promoting force, even after controlling for bilateral distance.”
- The Trade Creation Effect of Immigrants: Evidence from the Remarkable Case of Spain (2010, positive): “Finally, also the other three studies included in the review, Dunlevy and Hutchinson (1999) for the US using historical data (1870-1910), Girma and Yu (2002) for the UK and Wagner et al. (2002) for Canada find effects not far from 0.”
- Language and Foreign Trade (2008, positive): “We have some clear indication of the importance of DC from results of gravity models showing that immigrants promote trade with their country of origin (see Gould (1994), Head and Ries (1998), and Dunlevy and Hutchinson (1999), Wagner et al. (2002) , and Rauch and Trindade (2002)).”
- The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence (2010, positive): “for some of the decline in trade after independence. The coefficient on the log of the expat population is significant and equal to 0.290, implying a 10% reduction in expats leads to about a 3% reduction in bilateral trade. This estimate lies within the range obtained in the immigration and trade li”