Emotion and Regulation are One!

By Arvid Kappas. 2011

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d39f7f21e42be96aae9bf6a70bffcaa90334a521

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. P. Sheeran
2. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
3. Peter M. Gollwitzer
4. Peter Kuppens
5. Philippe Verduyn
6. Maya Tamir
7. Tom Hollenstein
8. E. Miles

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
2. P. Sheeran
3. Peter M. Gollwitzer
4. Maya Tamir
5. Tom Hollenstein
6. E. Miles
7. Philippe Verduyn
8. Peter Kuppens

Citations in the corpus

• Looking at Emotion Regulation Through the Window of Emotion Dynamics (2015, background): “As such, it proposes an answer to the long-standing debate whether and how emotion generation and regulation are different or the same (e.g., Gross & Barrett, 2011; Kappas, 2011).”
• The Maturing Field of Emotion Regulation (2011, background): “Kappas (2011) argues that emotion regulation is influenced by social processes.”
• Joy and Calm: How an Evolutionary Functional Model of Affect Regulation Informs Positive Emotions in Nature (2016, background): “Although the forest-based studies lack the control of the laboratory, Kappas (2011) is critical of labbased research into emotional response, and McMahan and Estes (2015) found that across 32 studies, there was no significant difference in positive affect responses to real nature vs lab-based…”
• Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012, background): “One possibility is that emotion regulation is so common that in many instances it represents the “default” strategy (cf. the debate over whether emotion generation can be separated from emotion regulation; Gross & Feldman Barrett, 2011; Kappas, 2011; Thompson, 2011).”
• This Time, It’s Real: Affective Flexibility, Time Scales, Feedback Loops, and the Regulation of Emotion (2015, background): “…in this article the connections between Flex3 and emotion regulation are explored based on the implications of the inseparability of emotion and regulation (Kappas, 2011) and differences between real-time dynamics and changes in diurnal affect observed from intermittent sampling methods.”
• Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A Conceptual and Operational Review and Future Research Agenda (2018, unknown): “…these three approaches are not the only ways that ER can be examined in other contexts (e.g. close romantic relationships, Diamond and Hicks 2005; Kappas 2011; Totenhagen et al. 2016), we contend that these three frameworks have predominantly driven interpersonal ER approaches in organisational…”
• Effects of Dynamic Aspects of Facial Expressions: A Review (2013, background): “Arguably, facial behavior can be understood as serving a variety of functions that include intra- and interpersonal emotional regulation (Butler, 2011; Kappas, 2011).”