This Time, It’s Real: Affective Flexibility, Time Scales, Feedback Loops, and the Regulation of Emotion

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic review of the relationship between rigidity/flexibility and transdiagnostic cognitive and behavioral processes that maintain psychopathology (2018, background): “This definition encompasses emotional rigidity (or emo- tional inertia): “emotional inertia is the tendency to persist in emotional states, particularly negative states” (Hollenstein, 2015, p. 310).”
It’s About Time: A Special Section on Affect Dynamics (2015, background): “An integration of affect and regulatory feedback is also a central notion in the contribution by Hollenstein (2015).”
PoKi: A Large Dataset of Poems by Children (2020, background): “Emotions change from one moment to the next, but also more gradually in terms of developmental time (Hollenstein, 2015; Kuppens and Verduyn, 2017).”
Determinants of Emotion Duration and Underlying Psychological and Neural Mechanisms (2015, background): “Third, one may conjecture that the occurrence of events that are not related to the emotion may influence emotion duration as well (Hollenstein, 2015), for instance by providing emotional counterweight (e.g., receiving good news when feeling sad) or by offering an opportunity for distraction, but…”
Micro-Level Affect Dynamics in Psychopathology Viewed From Complex Dynamical System Theory (2015, unknown): “Typically, higher levels of inertia have been interpreted as signs of increased vulnerability and decreased psychological flexibility (Hollenstein, 2015).”