Responses of American toad tadpoles to predation cues: behavioural response thresholds, threat-sensitivity and acquired predation recognition

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Citations in the corpus

Temporal variability, threat sensitivity and conflicting information about the nature of risk: understanding the dynamics of tadpole antipredator behaviour (2009, unknown): “Tadpoles can learn to recognize a novel predator through the pairing of injured conspecific cues and the odour of the novel predator (Woody & Mathis 1998; Mirza et al. 2006).”
Threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition by larval amphibians (2009, unknown): “…aquatic prey, a widespread mode of learning is through the pairing of injured conspecific cues with the odor or sight of a novel predator (e.g., larval amphibians—Woody and Mathis 1998, Mirza et al. 2006; fishes—Mathis and Smith 1993; aquatic invertebrates—Wisenden and Millard 2001, Hazlett 2003).”
Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “Respond to conspecific alarm cues Respond to diet cues Learn to recognize predators through pairing with alarm cues Larval Woodfrog, Rana sylvatica LeConte, 1825 (= Lithobates sylvaticus (LeConte, 1825)) Ferrari et al. 2007b; but see Petranka and Hayes 1998 — Ferrari et al. 2008b Iberian Green Frog,”