A new approach to predict the market and impacts of round-trip and point-to-point carsharing systems: Case study of London
By Scott Le Vine, M. Lee-Gosselin, Aruna Sivakumar, John W. Polak. 2014
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d371302e11d2c9490449ad4b436bb068b058f09f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Henrik Becker
- Kay W. Axhausen
- Francesco Ciari
- Cláudia A. Soares Machado
- T. Donna Chen
- Jillian Anable
- Nicolas Hue
- Kara M. Kockelman
Citations in the corpus
- The governance of smart mobility (2017, background): “…few people are currently using them and their impact on behaviour at the aggregate level is modest (McGuirk and Dowling, 2009) and often positive (Le Vine et al., 2014): they could in fact be clear signposts to the creeping privilege of certain mobility solutions over others through the…”
- Carsharing’s Life-Cycle Impacts on Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2016, background): “In terms of mode substitution, free-floating carsharing services are 416 generally found to be more substitutable for transit, walking, and cycling modes than are station-417 based systems (Ciari et al., 2014, Le Vine et al., 2014).”
- An Overview of Shared Mobility (2018, background): “In general, customers need to reserve their cars in advance, though it can be possible to find an available vehicle on short notice when utilization is low [61,62]).”
- Measuring the car ownership impact of free-floating car-sharing – A case study in Basel, Switzerland (2018, background): “[6] suggest that such one-way car-sharing schemes are more attractive to customers, but less of a complement to public transport than round-trip car-sharing.”
- Comparing Car-Sharing Schemes in Switzerland: User Groups and Usage Patterns (2016, background): “…found that round-trip car-sharing has a far more positive impact on the transport system as it is used to complement public transit, whereas point-to-point car-sharing is used in parallel to public transit and therefore has a questionable impact on the transportation system (Le Vine et al., 2014b).”